UK time is: 08:52:47
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Making sense of NUFC finance

Following the sale of Andy Carroll, the TOTT message board has been trying to make sense of the Toon`s accounts. We attempt to provide some clarity.

The Carroll situation was indeed baffling. The manager stated that "financially we could not keep him" whilst his Chairman, Derek Llambias added "'The fact is Mike Ashley didn't want to sell him, it's not like he needs the money is it?" One of these statements may be true, but which one?

In May last year, the club issued a statement as to the guiding principles for the next 5 year plan. It is stated that "the ultimate goal will be to ensure that the club is run at a 'break even' manner by the year 2015/2016". It might naturally be assumed that the club would run at a loss until then, but this was not made explicit. Indeed the opposite might be true.

There are a number of approaches that can be taken to answer the question, and of course there is an element of guesswork involved. However, past experience of projecting the financial accounts suggests that a reasonable degree of accuracy can be assured.

The club is expected to have made a loss last season, coping with a year in the Championship. The accounts have to be submitted before the end of March, and we shall have some idea then the extent of the damage. What is happening this season will not be in the public domain perhaps until March 2012.

By way of comparison, a reasonable starting point would appear to be looking at the accounts from the previous Premier League season, which saw the relegation. A loss was posted of 15.2m. What is important is how that loss was made up.

Simply put, a club has income and costs. For accounting purposes, there are some technicalities that allocate costs to different years, notably the transfer fees paid for players, but more of that later.

Newcastle United`s income, or revenue, is broken down into 3 broadly equal areas, Matchday, which is gate money, TV deals which are probably self explanatory, and Commercial, which is made up of all other activities, from sponsorship to shirt sales and royalties.

Gates are fairly similar to the relegation season, with prices pretty much the same, so we can expect to see little change from the 2008-9 figure of around 29m, which was in fact down by around 3.5m on the season before. Commercial income might also be expected to be similar, with kit sales typically showing an increase when new strips are available. There has been a new kit this year. Total income then was around 85m, down from almost 100m the previous year.

The biggest change compared with 2 years ago is that TV revenues have increased significantly, overseas arrangements reported to be leading to a reported increase of around 20m compared with previous years in the Premier League. On balance, the assumption is made that this is indeed the case, leading to a total club income in excess of 100m, perhaps significantly.

The largest element of costs is that of players` wages. 2 years ago this was approaching 72m, an inordinate percentage of turnover at over 80%. Conventional wisdom suggests that 50% is the maximum to be prudent.

Expensive players have gone. Notable wage earners who departed after relegation were Owen, Viduka, Martins and Duff and Cacapa. It will be remembered that Shay Given left in the January window, with Nicky Butt since retired.

Other experienced players to have gone through the exit door include Beye, Geremi and Faye with Xisco out on loan. Some contracts have been renewed at an improved rate, with other younger players brought in. Even so, it is a conservative estimate that the wage bill is now around 45m per year, a saving of over 25m.

This is the technical bit, so if you are not ready, skip this paragraph. Next on the list is amortisation. Trying to keep it simple, if a player is bought for 10m on a 4 year contract, the fee is spread over the life of the contract, so costs 2.5m per year, which is the "amortisation" figure. In the relegation season, amortisation was almost 20m, but included players whose figures were high, starting with Michael Owen at over 4m per year.

Current players who have been purchased and still amortised include Smith, Barton, Coloccini, Simpson, Gutierrez, Ben Arfa, Routledge, Best, Enrique and Tiote. As far as the profit figure goes, the difference is a saving of around 6m on a conservative estimate.

A further item related to the sacking of Sam Allardyce, a net cost of 6m. This is offset to a relatively minor extent by the sacking of Chris Hughton. Although under normal circumstances interest payments would also have to be considered, Ashley`s loans to the club are interest free, saving around 6m compared with previous years.

The last major item to consider in profit and loss is that of players sold. Players are valued at "book" value, i.e. the amount they cost minus the amortisation. The 10m player on a 4 year contract who is amortised at 2.5m per year is therefore worth 7.5m after 1 year, 5m after 2 years and so on. If they are sold, a profit is calculated based on the book value, not the value when purchased.

Major sales during the relegation season were Milner, N`Zogbia, Given, Emre and Faye. They all led to a positive in the accounts, a total of 23m. This season, nobody has been sold, therefore this has an adverse effect on the accounts for this year before the sale of Andy Carroll, a player who cost nothing, but has been sold for a reputed 35m, giving a net gain this year of 12m compared with 2 years ago.

In summary, there have been gains of 20m, 25m, 6m, 6m and 12m, totalling 69m. Against this is the loss made 2 years ago, of 15m, which still leaves a very significant profit, even allowing for inaccuracies.

In fairness to the club, there has been a change in policy, paying for players transferred in up front, which means that the profit figure is not necessarily translated into money in the bank. If for example, Tiote was bought for 4m, that represents cash out, but the accounting cost, assuming a 4 year contract, is only 1.5m.Therefore, not all of the 54m or so profit is cash in the bank.

Depending on the response to this piece, the cash position can be looked at in another article and needs to be balanced against advance season ticket sales under the current offer.

The club is more than welcome to challenge these figures, all of which have been sourced as reliably as possible. Indeed, any clarification is more than welcome. However, the overall message is clear, that a loss making club has been turned into a profitable one, perhaps even the most profitable in the Premier League.

That profit will ultimately be offset against the considerable cost that Ashley has undertaken in buying Newcastle United and taking on the debt mountain left by his predecessors. If he wishes to sell, it should certainly be an easier task than after the mess created in the Shepherd era when a number of buyers bailed out after the due diligence stage.

Where we go from here is either with Ashley, making a profit out of the club, or with a new buyer, able to compete on a sound financial footing. The contract renewals over the next couple of years might persuade Ashley that the exit door is the most attractive option. Time will tell.




Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: Rexn  Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Thursday February 10 2011

Time: 8:00AM

Your Comments

The other issue that arises from the sale of Andy Carroll is the "Mike has promised me the 35m to spend on players" bull from the Bullmeister himself. By the time any money is spent in summer the club could have reached its year end in July so will be able to spend any money on outlays from next years trading. In addition to which, by the time Patsy Pardew spends any money it probably woont be the physical 35m from Liverpool but part of the end of season Sky TV handout. This, depending on our final position, could be as much as 40m. Thus leaving the AC cash nicely tucked away in the bank. What's the betting that there's an clause somewhere in the accounts which triggers a payment into Mike Ashley's loan fund as and when the club make a profit ?
AMac
Good point AM. The loan clause is all encompassing and is repayable on demand. You're also right about the cash flows. Having apparently has assurances about the 35m, the next set of assurances should relate to any incoming transfer fees from the sumer, as well as season ticket sales, as you say.
Rexn
The clubs release their figures, something like 18 months behind and on release of our account sheet, i expect our figure to be showing us shockingly in debt. This wont take into consideration many things plus what's happened to balance the books and beyond since relegation.... Be interesting to see a dumb person's guide to our actual gain/loss year on year. none of the 'on paper' stuff. just plain, simple figures. We wont be so financially strained i bet
toon_nomatterwot
That's a good point too, TNMW. Unfortunately, until the accounts come out, we don't really know, but can maker guesses. The key thing is with transfers and how installments are paid. Taking Milner as an example, the installments could be equal, but there is a rule now that if the player transfers to another club, the outstanding balance has to be paid, so the club is probably relatively cash rich. It sounds as though most of the Carroll fee is up front too.
Rexn
Thanks RexN interesting read yet again. Have thought for some time that we should quite probably be either rather close to being back in the black r very near to the same. Makes me wonder if the (rolling??) 5 year plan to break even by 2015/16 means no debt ie.. Mr Ashleys 'interest free' loan paid off (???) Just a thought the money has to go somewhere.
Birdys
Once again Birdys, thanks. This summer will tell us a lot about his intentions.
Rexn
Great article Rex, the summer will be an interesting time
jiggystoon
Solid write up my good man. It's easy to be cynical about their intentions, which is why I am.
bowburnmag
 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Newcastle United Articles

Liam Sweeney and John Alder (Monday July 21 2014)

Ben Arfa Saga Is A Real Shame (Thursday July 17 2014)

Janmaat Gets His Confirmation (Thursday July 17 2014)

Surely It's Too Late For Grenier? (Thursday July 17 2014)

French Riviere On Tyne (Thursday July 17 2014)

NUFC Edge Closer to Striking A Deal (Wednesday July 16 2014)

Toon on TV (Monday July 14 2014)

Janmaat Close To Sealing Deal (Monday July 14 2014)

NUFC Expectations (Monday July 14 2014)

NUFC Complete 6 Year Cabella Deal (Sunday July 13 2014)

Archived Newcastle United Articles

List All TOTT Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

1. Rexn 223
2. OldLeazes 215
3. officemonkey 192
4. Toon_NoMatterWot 176
5. AMac 171
6. carlosvendetta 146
7. billybobcat 115
8. Wilco 78
9. johnjohnson 70
10. Kim Jong Un 65

League Results (view all)

Latest Results

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
9. Liverpool 0 0 0 0 0 0
10. Man City 0 0 0 0 0 0
11. Man Utd 0 0 0 0 0 0
12. Newcastle 0 0 0 0 0 0
13. Q.P.R. 0 0 0 0 0 0
14. Southampton 0 0 0 0 0 0
15. Spurs 0 0 0 0 0 0

Breaking League News

Alonso Deal A Non Starter?
Sunderland : 23/07/2014 08:47:00
Fabregas on Board
Chelsea : 23/07/2014 07:52:00
West Ham - Live on BT Sport This Morning!
West Ham : 23/07/2014 07:44:00
Chelsea miss the final piece of the puzzle
Chelsea : 23/07/2014 07:39:00
Swindon Was Okay - Koeman
Southampton : 22/07/2014 19:55:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Are we stronger than when we finished 5th?
Suggested By:  TNMW
Yes, there's absolutely no doubt we are 15%
Divvent be stupid man, what planet yee from? 85%